Practice Dashboard

Business health, book analytics, and portfolio theory — unified.

Complete practice view — all sections in one scroll: KPIs, revenue, book composition, MPT analytics, team, and succession.

Total AUM

Total Annual Revenue

Avg AUM / Client

Avg Revenue / Client

Practice Health Score

83/ 100

Revenue

Retention

Compliance

Pipeline

Client Metrics

Total Clients

New This Period

At-Risk Clients

Needs attention

Retention Rate

96.0%

Operating Metrics

Gross Margin72.0%

Net Margin44.0%

Operating Margin52.0%

Expense Ratio28.0%

Revenue vs Expenses

AUM Trend

Revenue Concentration (Top 10)

Cash Flow Summary

Sales Pipeline

AUM Distribution

Tier Distribution

clients

Risk Profile Distribution

Client Age Distribution

Client Geographic Distribution

State	Clients	Total AUM

At-Risk Clients

No at-risk clients.

Last Contact Tracker

Upcoming Reviews (next 30 days)

No reviews in the next 30 days.

Upcoming Birthdays

No birthdays in the next 30 days.

New Client Onboarding

No prospects in pipeline.

Book Sharpe Ratio

0.00

Risk-adj. return

Sortino Ratio

0.00

Downside adj.

Portfolio Beta

0.00

Market sensitivity

Jensen's Alpha

+0.00%

Active return vs CAPM

Wtd Avg Return

0.0%

Expected annual return

Portfolio Volatility

0.0%

Annualized std deviation

Risk / Return Scatter

Each client by volatility & expected return, colored by risk profile

Efficient Frontier

Parametric frontier with client portfolios and Capital Market Line

Asset Class Correlation

6 × 6 correlation matrix across book-wide asset classes

Aggregate Asset Allocation

Book-wide weighted allocation — Total AUM: $0

Sector Exposure

Book-level sector weights vs. S&P 500 benchmark

Portfolio Weights

Deviation from Benchmark

Overweight: Healthcare, Energy, Real Estate, Utilities|Underweight: Technology, Financials, Consumer Disc., Comm. Services, Consumer Staples

Advisor Capacity Planner

Per-advisor service hours vs. 520-hr annual capacity — based on A/B/C tier weights

Advisor	Capacity	Status
Sarah Chen	0%	Available
Marcus Thompson	0%	Available
Emily Rodriguez	0%	Available
James Kim	0%	Available
Rachel Patel	0%	Available

Compensation & Production

T12 trailing 12 months

Team YTD Production$1,835,000 / $2,000,000

92% of annual branch target$165,000 remaining

Advisor	T12 Production	Tier	Progress to Next	Payout Rate	Net Payout	Team Split	Bonus Qtrs
Sarah Chen	$620,000	Gold	24% to next tier$380,000 to Gold	42%	$260,400	29%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Marcus Thompson	$480,000	Silver	92% to next tier$20,000 to Silver	38%	$182,400	23%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Emily Rodriguez	$310,000	Silver	24% to next tier$190,000 to Silver	35%	$108,500	15%	Q1 Q2 Q3
James Kim	$245,000	Bronze	98% to next tier$5,000 to Bronze	30%	$73,500	12%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Rachel Patel	$180,000	Bronze	72% to next tier$70,000 to Bronze	28%	$50,400	9%	Q1 Q2 Q3

Tier thresholds:Bronze < $250KSilver $250K–$500KGold $500K–$1MPlatinum > $1MBonus dots = quarterly targets hit (75% / 90% / 100%)

Branch Team

Branch AUM vs. Target$427,000,000 / $500,000,000

85% of branch AUM target · $73,000,000 remaining

Production Leaderboard

Rank	Advisor	AUM Managed	Clients	T12 Revenue	Capacity
1	Sarah Chen	$142,000,000	48	$620,000	Near capacity 48/55
2	Marcus Thompson	$115,000,000	41	$480,000	Accepting clients 41/55
3	Emily Rodriguez	$74,000,000	29	$310,000	Accepting clients 29/50
4	James Kim	$58,000,000	24	$245,000	Accepting clients 24/50
5	Rachel Patel	$38,000,000	17	$180,000	Accepting clients 17/45

Cross-Referral Activity

Sarah ChenEmily RodriguezZhou EstateApr 14accepted

Marcus ThompsonJames KimOkafor FamilyApr 22accepted

Sarah ChenRachel PatelBergmann TrustApr 28pending

Emily RodriguezSarah ChenAlvarez IRAMay 1accepted

James KimMarcus ThompsonTanaka HoldingsMay 3pending

Marcus ThompsonRachel PatelRusso InvestmentsMay 5accepted

Rachel PatelEmily RodriguezNovak PortfolioMay 6declined

Emily RodriguezJames KimMensah RetirementMay 7pending

Fee Compression & Pricing Analytics

$8,675 at risk

Avg Stated Rate

99.0bp

0.99% AUM

Avg Effective Rate

95.0bp

0.95% AUM

Clients Below Rate

60%

6 of 10 clients

Annual Revenue at Risk

$8,675

vs. stated schedule

Client	AUM	Stated Rate	Effective Rate	Fee Gap	Annual Revenue
Harrison Family Trust	$4,800,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$45,600
Nakamura Investments	$3,200,000	100bp	90bp	10bp	$28,800
Garcia Retirement	$2,100,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$21,000
Patel Holdings LLC	$1,850,000	95bp	85bp	10bp	$15,725
Chen Family Office	$1,400,000	95bp	90bp	5bp	$12,600
Thompson IRA	$920,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$9,200
Rodriguez 401k Rollover	$740,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$7,030
Kim Portfolio	$520,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$5,200
Anderson Trust	$310,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$2,945
Williams Savings	$195,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$1,950
Total annual revenue					$150,050

Avg Fee Gap by Segment (bp)

Revenue Impact Scenario

Reduce fees by0bp

If average fee drops by 0bp:No change

Practice Value & Succession

AUM concentration risk

Estimated Practice Value

$982,100,000

at 2.3x AUM (82% recurring)

Range: $640,500,000 – $1,067,500,000

1.5x conservative · 2.5x premium

Multiplier is driven by recurring revenue %. Raise recurring mix from 82% to 90%+ to reach the premium tier.

Total AUM$427,000,000

Annual Revenue$1,835,000

Recurring Revenue82%

Client Retention Rate96%

Average Client Age58 yrs

AUM Concentration (top 5 clients)28%

Succession Readiness72/100

In progress

Succession plan documented

Reviewed Feb 2026

Successor advisor identified

Marcus Thompson (internal)

Client contact transferred to CRM

All 159 clients migrated

Business valuation completed

Schedule with M&A advisor

Non-compete / key-man review done

Pending legal review

Transition Timeline

1Complete all 1-year milestones

2Gradual client handoff (50% by month 18)

3Earn-out payment schedule agreed

4Full client book transferred

5Seller moves to advisory / consultant role

Practice Dashboard

Business health, book analytics, and portfolio theory — unified.

Complete practice view — all sections in one scroll: KPIs, revenue, book composition, MPT analytics, team, and succession.

Total AUM

Total Annual Revenue

Avg AUM / Client

Avg Revenue / Client

Practice Health Score

83/ 100

Revenue

Retention

Compliance

Pipeline

Client Metrics

Total Clients

New This Period

At-Risk Clients

Needs attention

Retention Rate

96.0%

Operating Metrics

Gross Margin72.0%

Net Margin44.0%

Operating Margin52.0%

Expense Ratio28.0%

Revenue vs Expenses

AUM Trend

Revenue Concentration (Top 10)

Cash Flow Summary

Sales Pipeline

AUM Distribution

Tier Distribution

clients

Risk Profile Distribution

Client Age Distribution

Client Geographic Distribution

State	Clients	Total AUM

At-Risk Clients

No at-risk clients.

Last Contact Tracker

Upcoming Reviews (next 30 days)

No reviews in the next 30 days.

Upcoming Birthdays

No birthdays in the next 30 days.

New Client Onboarding

No prospects in pipeline.

Book Sharpe Ratio

0.00

Risk-adj. return

Sortino Ratio

0.00

Downside adj.

Portfolio Beta

0.00

Market sensitivity

Jensen's Alpha

+0.00%

Active return vs CAPM

Wtd Avg Return

0.0%

Expected annual return

Portfolio Volatility

0.0%

Annualized std deviation

Risk / Return Scatter

Each client by volatility & expected return, colored by risk profile

Efficient Frontier

Parametric frontier with client portfolios and Capital Market Line

Asset Class Correlation

6 × 6 correlation matrix across book-wide asset classes

Aggregate Asset Allocation

Book-wide weighted allocation — Total AUM: $0

Sector Exposure

Book-level sector weights vs. S&P 500 benchmark

Portfolio Weights

Deviation from Benchmark

Overweight: Healthcare, Energy, Real Estate, Utilities|Underweight: Technology, Financials, Consumer Disc., Comm. Services, Consumer Staples

Advisor Capacity Planner

Per-advisor service hours vs. 520-hr annual capacity — based on A/B/C tier weights

Advisor	Capacity	Status
Sarah Chen	0%	Available
Marcus Thompson	0%	Available
Emily Rodriguez	0%	Available
James Kim	0%	Available
Rachel Patel	0%	Available

Compensation & Production

T12 trailing 12 months

Team YTD Production$1,835,000 / $2,000,000

92% of annual branch target$165,000 remaining

Advisor	T12 Production	Tier	Progress to Next	Payout Rate	Net Payout	Team Split	Bonus Qtrs
Sarah Chen	$620,000	Gold	24% to next tier$380,000 to Gold	42%	$260,400	29%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Marcus Thompson	$480,000	Silver	92% to next tier$20,000 to Silver	38%	$182,400	23%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Emily Rodriguez	$310,000	Silver	24% to next tier$190,000 to Silver	35%	$108,500	15%	Q1 Q2 Q3
James Kim	$245,000	Bronze	98% to next tier$5,000 to Bronze	30%	$73,500	12%	Q1 Q2 Q3
Rachel Patel	$180,000	Bronze	72% to next tier$70,000 to Bronze	28%	$50,400	9%	Q1 Q2 Q3

Tier thresholds:Bronze < $250KSilver $250K–$500KGold $500K–$1MPlatinum > $1MBonus dots = quarterly targets hit (75% / 90% / 100%)

Branch Team

Branch AUM vs. Target$427,000,000 / $500,000,000

85% of branch AUM target · $73,000,000 remaining

Production Leaderboard

Rank	Advisor	AUM Managed	Clients	T12 Revenue	Capacity
1	Sarah Chen	$142,000,000	48	$620,000	Near capacity 48/55
2	Marcus Thompson	$115,000,000	41	$480,000	Accepting clients 41/55
3	Emily Rodriguez	$74,000,000	29	$310,000	Accepting clients 29/50
4	James Kim	$58,000,000	24	$245,000	Accepting clients 24/50
5	Rachel Patel	$38,000,000	17	$180,000	Accepting clients 17/45

Cross-Referral Activity

Sarah ChenEmily RodriguezZhou EstateApr 14accepted

Marcus ThompsonJames KimOkafor FamilyApr 22accepted

Sarah ChenRachel PatelBergmann TrustApr 28pending

Emily RodriguezSarah ChenAlvarez IRAMay 1accepted

James KimMarcus ThompsonTanaka HoldingsMay 3pending

Marcus ThompsonRachel PatelRusso InvestmentsMay 5accepted

Rachel PatelEmily RodriguezNovak PortfolioMay 6declined

Emily RodriguezJames KimMensah RetirementMay 7pending

Fee Compression & Pricing Analytics

$8,675 at risk

Avg Stated Rate

99.0bp

0.99% AUM

Avg Effective Rate

95.0bp

0.95% AUM

Clients Below Rate

60%

6 of 10 clients

Annual Revenue at Risk

$8,675

vs. stated schedule

Client	AUM	Stated Rate	Effective Rate	Fee Gap	Annual Revenue
Harrison Family Trust	$4,800,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$45,600
Nakamura Investments	$3,200,000	100bp	90bp	10bp	$28,800
Garcia Retirement	$2,100,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$21,000
Patel Holdings LLC	$1,850,000	95bp	85bp	10bp	$15,725
Chen Family Office	$1,400,000	95bp	90bp	5bp	$12,600
Thompson IRA	$920,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$9,200
Rodriguez 401k Rollover	$740,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$7,030
Kim Portfolio	$520,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$5,200
Anderson Trust	$310,000	100bp	95bp	5bp	$2,945
Williams Savings	$195,000	100bp	100bp	at rate	$1,950
Total annual revenue					$150,050

Avg Fee Gap by Segment (bp)

Revenue Impact Scenario

Reduce fees by0bp

If average fee drops by 0bp:No change

Practice Value & Succession

AUM concentration risk

Estimated Practice Value

$982,100,000

at 2.3x AUM (82% recurring)

Range: $640,500,000 – $1,067,500,000

1.5x conservative · 2.5x premium

Multiplier is driven by recurring revenue %. Raise recurring mix from 82% to 90%+ to reach the premium tier.

Total AUM$427,000,000

Annual Revenue$1,835,000

Recurring Revenue82%

Client Retention Rate96%

Average Client Age58 yrs

AUM Concentration (top 5 clients)28%

Succession Readiness72/100

In progress

Succession plan documented

Reviewed Feb 2026

Successor advisor identified

Marcus Thompson (internal)

Client contact transferred to CRM

All 159 clients migrated

Business valuation completed

Schedule with M&A advisor

Non-compete / key-man review done

Pending legal review

Transition Timeline

1Complete all 1-year milestones

2Gradual client handoff (50% by month 18)

3Earn-out payment schedule agreed

4Full client book transferred

5Seller moves to advisory / consultant role